Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Alexis Musialek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Musialek analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Alexis Musialek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 0 Musialek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 50.93% of points on their second serve, while Musialek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Musialek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.16% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 64.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Musialek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Musialek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 136/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12). Musialek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 251/ 169), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 17/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Musialek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Masur winning 1 times and Musialek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Masur winning 2 and Musialek winning 0. The last match between Masur and Musialek was at the Spain F28, 22-09-2014, First, Clay with Daniel Masur getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Musialek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Musialek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 0, and Musialek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.23 while Musialek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Musialek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 44.01% of breakpoint opportunities, and Musialek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
299
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
879
Rank
255
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (386-281)
Career Total W/L
58% (367-263)
76% (34-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Daniel Masur vs Alexis Musialek For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Masur VS Musialek
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Daniel Masur | Alexis Musialek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Alexis Musialek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 76% (34/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (75/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (595/454) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 247 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 120 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178.49 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (2081/3206) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 75% (1566/2081) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (573/1125) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (147/334) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1311/3320) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (34/45) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 59% (13/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (37/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (37/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Daniel Masur
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
115)
28
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
108
|
1-6 7-6(7) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Oleksii Krutykh
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
106)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Musialek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Alexis Musialek
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Cayre
Player
Alexis Musialek
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Winter Lopez
Player
Alexis Musialek
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xavi Matas Ortega
Player
Alexis Musialek
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Alexis Musialek
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Akira Santillan
Player
Alexis Musialek
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Musialek
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
49 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Potenza
Player
Alexis Musialek
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
48%
(
14 of
29)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
42
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Alexis Musialek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Alexis Musialek
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Musialek Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Masur are available here and Musialek photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
